![]() |
| Even Sports Illustrated knew the Colts were taking a big risk in drafting Jeff George. |
For the rest of this post, we'll stick to sure things, namely that Andrew Luck will be the Colts' pick at #1 overall. The Colts think he's a sure thing and are so sure of it that they cut ties with Peyton Manning.
After the jump, a look at the best- and worst-case scenarios for the Colts and Andrew Luck.
In the 42 drafts since the merger, a quarterback has gone #1 overall 19 times, more than any other position. Recent history has seen this happen even more often; each of the past 3 years and 4 of the past 5, a QB has gone #1.
We'll use the "performance points" system put forth by Bill Barnwell in his column yesterday:
- 1 point for a game started
- 0.5 points for a game played but not started
- 10 points for a Pro Bowl
- 10 more points for 1st-team All-Pro
We're also adding another 10 points for a Super Bowl win, which is all the more important with a quarterback given that he's the face of the franchise.
For now, we'll put the top picks from the last three years (Cam Newton, Sam Bradford, and Matthew Stafford) in the "too early to tell" bucket, leaving us 16 QBs to rate:
16 QBs Taken #1 Overall, 1970-2008, Ranked by Performance Points (active players in yellow)
Rank
|
Year
|
Player
|
Games Started
|
Games Subbed
|
Pro Bowls
|
1st Team All-Pro
|
Super Bowl Wins
|
Seasons
|
Total Points
|
Points Per Season
|
1
|
98
|
P. Manning
|
208
|
0
|
11
|
5
|
1
|
14
|
378
|
27
|
2
|
83
|
J. Elway
|
231
|
3
|
9
|
1
|
2
|
16
|
353
|
22
|
3
|
89
|
T. Aikman
|
165
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
3
|
12
|
265
|
22
|
4
|
93
|
D. Bledsoe
|
193
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
14
|
244
|
17
|
5
|
87
|
V Testaverde
|
214
|
19
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
244
|
12
|
6
|
70
|
T. Bradshaw
|
158
|
10
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
14
|
243
|
17
|
7
|
71
|
J. Plunkett
|
144
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
15
|
171
|
11
|
8
|
04
|
E. Manning
|
119
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
8
|
160
|
20
|
9
|
75
|
S. Bartkowski
|
127
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
148
|
12
|
10
|
01
|
M. Vick
|
92
|
19
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
142
|
16
|
11
|
90
|
J. George
|
124
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
128
|
11
|
12
|
03
|
C. Palmer
|
106
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
127
|
16
|
13
|
02
|
D. Carr
|
79
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
86
|
11
|
14
|
05
|
A Smith
|
66
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
68
|
11
|
15
|
99
|
T. Couch
|
59
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
61
|
12
|
16
|
07
|
J. Russell
|
25
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
28
|
9
|
Average
|
131.9
|
6.4
|
2.8
|
0.5
|
0.9
|
11.1
|
177.6
|
15.4
| ||
So if you're a Colts fan, your best case scenario for the man tabbed to replace Peyton Manning is, well, Peyton Manning. Your worst case? JaMarcus Russell! Your most likely? Probably somewhere in the middle third of the table above from, say, from #6 to #11. 1 Hall of Famer (Bradshaw), 3 multiple Super Bowl winners (Bradshaw, Plunkett, and Manning), and one Jeff George (remember him, Colts fans?) in that bunch.
Maybe the scariest stat for Colts fans? Only 7 of the QBs above -- less than half -- ever won a Super Bowl, and one of them (Bledsoe) didn't play in it (although, to be fair, the Pats don't beat Pittsburgh in the '01 AFC Title game without Bledsoe).
(Sidenote: Did you realize Vinny Testaverde played for 21 seasons!?)
![]() |
| Vinny, the #1 overall pick 25 years ago, on the cover of Sports Illustrated |
Enjoy the frenzied run-up to the draft . . .
Like me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Like me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog


I said it in your previous post and I'll say it again.... You just can't replace Manning!
ReplyDeleteHow can one be so confident in a college player that they can drop a guy like Manning? College football and the NFL are two different leagues. You can't predict NFL success based on college performance.
Remember all the hype and expectations of Matt Leinart? Where is he now? Unemployed if I'm not mistaken. He may have been great in college but in professional sports... he amounts to squat!
I don't think anybody, including the Colt's front office is thinking about replacing Peyton Manning, but you have to look at what was going on from the Colt's perspective. 1) Peyton was hurt the entire season and the money we were spending on him (while he earned every penny) has been crippling to the rest of our team's glaring needs, 2) we have a chance to draft an impressive QB who would have sat unused on the bench, when their were many other needs than having a 20 million dollar "camp arm", 3) We didn't force him out, it was a mutual parting of ways. I sincerely think there was no ill will between these two sides and Peyton will be a Colt again when he retires. To constantly keep comparing Luck to Peyton is unfair to him and I think that Colts fans need to stop doing it!
DeleteOnly 10 points for a super bowl win?!?! Who are you? Donovan Mcnabb?
ReplyDelete