![]() |
| Ace Ventura and Roger Podacter think the Dolphins were better than their record last year. |
Team A:
Week 1: Win, 21-20
Week 2: Win, 24-23
Week 3: Win, 27-24
Week 4: Win, 9-7
Team B:
Week 1: Win, 35-7
Week 2: Loss, 24-23
Week 3: Win, 17-7
Week 4: Loss, 21-17
Team A's record is 4-0, while Team B's is 2-2. But who's really the stronger team? Pythagorean expectation would tell us it's Team B. The formula is:
Expected wins =
((Points Scored)^2 / ((Points Scored)^2 + (Points Given Up)^2)) x # of Games Played
((Points Scored)^2 / ((Points Scored)^2 + (Points Given Up)^2)) x # of Games Played
Team A would have 2.2 expected wins for the 4 game stretch, while Team B would have 3.1. Pythagorean expectation is a bit flawed in football, given the low number of games in a season (it's much more applicable to baseball and its 162 game regular season), and it obviously discounts the merits of success in close-game situations, but it's instructive nonetheless in football.
After the jump, we'll look at the 32 teams and how their expected records compare with their actual records.
2011 NFL Records and Expected Records, Ranked by Expected Wins
Team
|
W
|
L
|
PF
|
PA
|
Exp. W
|
Exp. L.
|
Delta:
W -
Exp. W
|
Playoffs and seed?
|
Playoffs if Expected Wins instead of Actual Wins
| |
1
|
Niners
|
13
|
3
|
380
|
229
|
11.7
|
4.3
|
+1.3
|
NFCW Champ,
2 seed
|
NFCW Champ,
1 seed
|
2
|
Saints
|
13
|
3
|
547
|
339
|
11.6
|
4.4
|
+1.4
|
NFCS Champ,
3 seed
|
NFCS Champ,
2 seed
|
3
|
Packers
|
15
|
1
|
560
|
359
|
11.3
|
4.7
|
+3.7
|
NFCN Champ,
1 seed
|
NFCN Champ,
3 seed
|
4
|
Patriots
|
13
|
3
|
513
|
342
|
11.1
|
4.9
|
+1.9
|
AFCE Champ,
1 seed
|
AFCE Champ,
1 Seed
|
5
|
Steelers
|
12
|
4
|
325
|
227
|
10.8
|
5.2
|
+1.2
|
AFC Wild Card, 5 seed
|
AFCN Champ,
2 seed
|
6
|
Ravens
|
12
|
4
|
378
|
266
|
10.7
|
5.3
|
+1.3
|
AFCN Champ,
2 seed
|
AFC Wild Card, 5 seed
|
7
|
Texans
|
10
|
6
|
381
|
278
|
10.4
|
5.6
|
-0.4
|
AFCS Champ,
3 seed
|
AFCS Champ,
3 seed
|
8
|
Lions
|
10
|
6
|
474
|
387
|
9.6
|
6.4
|
+0.4
|
NFC Wild Card, 6 seed
|
NFC Wild Card, 5 seed
|
9
|
Eagles
|
8
|
8
|
396
|
328
|
9.5
|
6.5
|
-1.5
|
Missed playoffs
|
NFCE Champ,
4 seed
|
10
|
Falcons
|
10
|
6
|
402
|
305
|
9.1
|
6.9
|
+0.9
|
NFC Wild Card, 5 seed
|
NFC Wild Card, 6 seed
|
11
|
Chargers
|
8
|
8
|
406
|
377
|
8.6
|
7.4
|
-0.6
|
Missed playoffs
|
AFCW Champ, 4 seed
|
12
|
Bengals
|
9
|
7
|
344
|
323
|
8.5
|
7.5
|
+0.5
|
AFC Wild Card, 6 seed
|
AFC Wild Card, 6 seed
|
13
|
Cowboys
|
8
|
8
|
369
|
347
|
8.5
|
7.5
|
+0.5
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
14
|
Dolphins
|
6
|
10
|
329
|
313
|
8.4
|
7.6
|
-2.4
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
15
|
Jets
|
8
|
8
|
377
|
363
|
8.3
|
7.7
|
-0.3
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
16
|
Bears
|
8
|
8
|
353
|
341
|
8.3
|
7.7
|
-0.3
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
17
|
Titans
|
9
|
7
|
325
|
317
|
8.2
|
7.8
|
+0.8
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
18
|
Seahawks
|
7
|
9
|
321
|
315
|
8.2
|
7.8
|
-1.2
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
19
|
Giants
|
9
|
7
|
394
|
400
|
7.9
|
8.1
|
+1.1
|
NFCN Champ, 4 seed
|
Missed
playoffs
|
20
|
Panthers
|
6
|
10
|
406
|
429
|
7.6
|
8.4
|
-1.6
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
21
|
Cardinals
|
8
|
8
|
312
|
348
|
7.1
|
8.9
|
+0.9
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
22
|
Bills
|
6
|
10
|
374
|
434
|
6.8
|
9.2
|
-0.8
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
23
|
Raiders
|
8
|
8
|
359
|
433
|
6.5
|
9.5
|
+1.5
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
24
|
Broncos
|
8
|
8
|
309
|
390
|
6.2
|
9.8
|
+1.8
|
AFCW Champ, 4 seed
|
Missed
playoffs
|
25
|
Redskins
|
5
|
11
|
288
|
367
|
6.1
|
9.9
|
-1.1
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
26
|
Vikings
|
3
|
13
|
340
|
449
|
5.8
|
10.2
|
-2.8
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
27
|
Jaguars
|
5
|
11
|
243
|
329
|
5.6
|
10.4
|
-0.6
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
28
|
Browns
|
4
|
12
|
218
|
307
|
5.4
|
10.6
|
-1.4
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
29
|
Chiefs
|
7
|
9
|
212
|
338
|
4.5
|
11.5
|
+2.5
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
30
|
Bucs
|
4
|
12
|
287
|
494
|
4.0
|
12.0
|
0
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
31
|
Colts
|
2
|
14
|
243
|
430
|
3.9
|
12.1
|
-1.9
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
32
|
Rams
|
2
|
14
|
193
|
407
|
2.9
|
13.1
|
-0.9
|
Missed playoffs
|
Missed
playoffs
|
Some observations:
1. By this metric, the Broncos and the Super Bowl champion Giants look somewhat like flukes. Using Expected Wins rather than actual wins, neither would have even made the playoffs. The Giants were "really" a .500 team that was 1.5 games worse than the Eagles, and the Broncos were "really" a 6-win team. (The Giants, to be fair, were ravaged with injuries throughout the season, so the team that played in the playoffs was different than the one that played in the regular season.)
2. The Eagles and Chargers "should" have been playoff teams (division champs, in fact). The Eagles were a full 1.5 games below expectation -- the 4th "unluckiest" team in the league. The Chargers weren't quite as far off of expectation but were hurt by the division rival Broncos being so far above their expectation.
3. The Dolphins and Vikings were the only teams more than 2 games below expectation, making them the "unluckiest" teams in the league. The 6-10 Dolphins "should" have been a .500 team, and the 3-13 Vikings "should" have been 6-10.
4. No team had expected wins over 12, yet 6 teams had 12 or more wins (Pythagorean expectation would call each of the 6 "lucky"). Mathematically, a team has to score twice as many points as its opponents to have a win expectation of 12 or higher. It's only happened twice since 2002 -- the '05 Colts (12.2 expected wins, 14-2) and the '07 Pats (13.2 expected wins, 16-0). Notably, neither won the Super Bowl. The 2011 Packers (15-1) were "actually" only an 11.3-win team.
5. The Saints and Steelers would have gotten byes using Expected Wins, while the Ravens and Packers would have had to play the first weekend. Would that have impacted the playoffs? One can only speculate.
6. The "luckiest" teams of 2012? In order, the Packers, Chiefs, Pats, and Broncos (although the Packers and Pats still should have won their divisions). The unluckiest? The Dolphins and Vikings (as noted in #3 above), the lowly Colts, who should have only lost 12 games rather than 14, and the Panthers, who were really a .500 team instead of a 6-10 one.
Over the next several weeks, we'll be combining the expected wins concept with our draft rankings, as well as several other elements, as we try to come up with an intelligent view on each team heading into 2012. Stay tuned.
Think we're crazy? Think we're brilliant? Tell us in the comments!
Like us on Facebook at facebook.com/backupquarterbackblog
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/TheBackupQB
Idea for a post? Email backupquarterback@gmail.com

No comments:
Post a Comment